By Kristofer Bielefeld
Introduction
One point that has emerged in the age of social media is the
ability to be anonymous online, where your actions online are separate from your
real name and identity. Despite this, Facebook has a policy where you must use
your authentic name, as it is “the name [you] go by in everyday life” (Facebook).
Failing to register a “real name” will risk the chance of your account being deleted.
In 2015, this policy came under fire for how it affected those of marginalized
communities. For example, victims of abuse would have to create anonymous
profiles, so they can distance themselves from abusers.
Facebook does have the power to grant aliases, but it requires
you to verify your identity, which forces you to further give up your private
information. While this does give you an alias, Facebook now has more of your
private information in its databases.
Check
out the official Facebook policy here
Does this violate a reasonable expectation of privacy?
Facebook’s policy does not violate laws overtly, but it does raise some
questions on the nature of anonymity in digital spaces. Anonymity is protected
under the 1st Amendment, as it supports the freedom of speech. Maybe
you want to leave a review on an acne removal product, but you are worried that
people may see that you specifically bought this product. Other people could
find this review, and they might harass you for it. Using a pseudonym makes
sure that the product is not associated with you in the slightest. To imagine a
more extreme scenario, an investigative journalist trying to break a story of corporate
corruption may prefer to be anonymous to prevent retaliation and backlash. Anonymity
allows for you to create an honest environment, where you feel free to speak
your mind.
However, there is a benefit to not being anonymous online. Having your account
being tied to your real name allows you to be a more credible source, because
your information can be traced back to you. People may be prone to act nicer
when they know what they say could be traced back to them. Whereas anonymity has
been shown to make people meaner when it comes to online interaction. Criminals
and cybercrime are an emerging problem as well, and using real names could make
tracking down suspects easier and more effective. Anonymous names may make it
harder to find who the cybercriminal is, and harder to prosecute as a result.
My Thoughts
While the policy of using your real name is a noble idea, I
think creating a pseudonym is a more viable option. With a pseudonym, while it
may limit the credibility, I think it helps enforce the idea of privacy when
you are online. Especially with other services that are linked to social media,
pseudonyms could come in handy. For example, some social media sites show the
location where you made a specific social media post. If the person who was
posting this picture online had to give their real name, and they currently had
an abusive relationship with a spouse, it would greatly benefit this person to
have a separate online identity. In turn, I think this separate online identity
should be treated in a similar way to the real names policy. For example,
YouTube creators do not post their real names online, but they tie back their online
information to this pseudonym. Similar to the pen names of authors in the past,
this pseudonym is credited with whatever content they create, and with whatever
statements they choose to have. So, while they have the freedom to express and
create the content they want to create, they still link this information back
to their YouTube identity. In this sense, your identity online is a separate
entity, where you can still be held accountable for the actions you take
online.
Question to discuss:
Should “real names” play a part in online identities, or
should we default to pseudonyms for online activity? Does either one allow for
accountability online?
Sources:
“Names allowed on Facebook.” Facebook, https://www.facebook.com/help/229715077154790
Accessed 24 Jan 2024.
Hendrickson, Lauren. “What is Pseudonomy and Why Does It Matter
for Digital Identity?” Identity, 1 May 2023, https://www.identity.com/pseudonymity-privacy-identity-digital-world/
Accessed 24 Jan 2024
Boyd, Danah. “ ‘Real Names’ Policies Are an Abuse Of Power.”
Social Media Collective, 4 August 2011, https://socialmediacollective.org/2011/08/04/real-names-policies-are-an-abuse-of-power/
Accessed 24 Jan 2024.
Galperin, Eva and Wafa Ben Hassine. “Changes to Facebook’s ‘Real
Names’ Policy Don’t Fix the Problem.” Electronic Frontier Foundation, 18
December 2015 https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2015/12/changes-facebooks-real-names-policy-still-dont-fix-problem
Accessed 24 Jan 2024.
Snider, Brett. “Can Facebook Force You to Use Your Real Name?”
FindLaw, Last updated 21 March 2019, https://www.findlaw.com/legalblogs/law-and-life/can-facebook-force-you-to-use-your-real-name/
Accessed 24 Jan 2024.
“The Pros and Cons of being Anonymous Online.” DeleteMe, 11
April 2023, https://joindeleteme.com/blog/pros-and-cons-of-being-anonymous-online/ Accessed 24 Jan 2024.
Talbert, Molly. “The Power of Pseudonyms in Online
Community.” Higher Logic, https://www.higherlogic.com/blog/the-power-of-pseudonyms-in-an-online-community/
Accessed 24 Jan 2024.
This topic is a little complex. I don't think that having the ability to make some fake accounts is a solid idea. Yes, it is good for privacy but it's also good for scams and bots. I Do think that the pseudonyms are a good idea but again a complex one. With Facebook making you have your everyday life name I can see the complication that people want with privacy, but Facebook is also more than just a swiping app. it also has marketplace and with the ability to make accounts with fake names and hidden privacy you will get more kidnapping and shooting with no trace of the culprit.
ReplyDeleteThere are many aspects to the topic. I believe the use of pseudonyms should revolve around what the app is used for and who it is used by. For a website that strives to provide nuanced discussion and true facts, requiring real names may be a smart idea because this can link the information back to the user, influencing the user to double check what they say to make sure it aligns with how they want their reputation to be. For something less serious, such as an online gaming platform, I believe users should have the right to use pseudonyms because that is part of the online gaming experience. When someone is playing video games, it is their time to relax and forget about real life worries, and the last thing they want is for their identity to be used against them for the purposes of harassment by others. The problem arises that pseudonyms open up the gateways to online bullying and the spreading of false information. However, I believe that in the setting of an online video game lobby, things that people say should be taken with a grain of salt, meaning that if someone is trying to convince me to drink only pickle juice from now on for health benefits, I am obviously not going to take the request seriously, not only because it is ridiculous, but because the information is coming from a random person who I have no reason to take his advice.
ReplyDelete