This week we were introduced to arguments against and for
privacy. A big part of this was government surveillance on civilians. The main argument
for surveillance was it was for national security, and could monitor terrorists.
The crux of this argument was the idea that good citizens had “nothing to
hide”, where the only people who had something worth hiding must be criminals.
Compelling on the surface, arguing that you have nothing to
hide inherently creates a quite binary display of the world. Initially, this
means that those with “nothing to hide” can consent to the collection of
possibly quite sensitive information without any idea of the intended use. Even
if the information is not used at all, there is still the possibility of a data
breach, and now your personal privacy is under massive scrutiny. Privacy
becomes more than sensitive information, it becomes power that is taken for
you, and can be abused.
This was one of my main takeaways, because of how precious
and sensitive the collection of data can really be. Privacy allows the practice
of certain ideas like free speech, where you are certain that you can speak
without punishment. In hand with this, privacy is important because it allows a
society to grow, and critique itself. An
absence of privacy will make people feel like they can be watched at any time,
causing not only a degree of paranoia, but halting the growth of that society.
No comments:
Post a Comment